Collapse and Measures of Consciousness

There has been an upsurge of interest lately in developing Wigner's hypothesis that conscious observation causes collapse by exploring dynamical models which some purportedly quantifiable aspect(s) consciousness resist superposition. Kremnizer-Ranchin, Chalmers-McQueen and Okon-Sebasti\'an have explored the idea may be associated with a numerical measure consciousness. More recently, argued any single is inadequate because it will allow superpositions distinct states equal to persist. They suggest satisfactory model needs associate set measures quantifying aspects consciousness, such as "Q-shapes" defined Tononi et al. their "integrated information theory" (IIT) I argue here Chalmers-McQueen's argument against associating requires precise symmetry between brain different experiences thus does not apply only case where we strong intuitions, namely human (or other terrestrial biological) observers. In defence stance, might idealized artificial processing networks could display symmetries. However, theory (such IIT) postulates map from network mind should assign identical isomorphic (as IIT does). This suggests that, if exists, no familiar components states, viewing colours, or experiencing pleasure pain, are likely related